Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 2 years ago,

User Stats

13
Posts
1
Votes
Karin Cornils
Pro Member
  • Fremont, CA
1
Votes |
13
Posts

SDIRA UBIT/UDFI on cash-out refi

Karin Cornils
Pro Member
  • Fremont, CA
Posted

If this question has been answered in a previous post, please feel free to redirect me to that post.

The property currently held by my SDIRA is free and clear of debt. If I were to buy a second property in this SDIRA , I am guessing that I have the option of refinancing it via a direct nonrecourse loan on the new property as well as using a cash-out refinance on the first property to help finance the second property, or possibly a combination of the two?

I wanted to get some clarity on how the UBIT/UDFI would be calculated if I used one property to fund the other. For instance, if I used a cash-out refi on the first to fund the second, am I correct in thinking that the income on the first property would not be taxed, but the net income on the second would be taxed on the percentage of the property funded by the first? Would there be an advantage to one loan approach over the other? Thanks.

  • Karin Cornils
  • Loading replies...