Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago,

User Stats

5
Posts
3
Votes
Reginald Smith Jr.
  • Florence SC
3
Votes |
5
Posts

Wholesaler's EMD not considered legal equitable interest anymore.

Reginald Smith Jr.
  • Florence SC
Posted

Hello all. I'm a property Wholesaler in Florence, SC. My Realtor received a disturbing news letter today from the South Carolina Real-Estate Commission titled, "Wholesalers." The newsletter was informing her that EMD's do not, or no longer will, be considered as a buyer's "equitable interest" anymore in the state of SC. Which would strip all non licensed real estate professionals of there ability to market there assignable contracts. If this is true, this could potentially negatively effect my business and every other RE professional that does business with me big time. As the 'equitable interest' loophole was the only way that we were allowed to 'legally' market our assignable contracts in the first place. My question to the RE attorneys out there is, is this true? Or, is it just some kind of scare tactic designed to put what they believe are there non-licensed competitors (Wholesalers) out of business? And FYI: I haven't submitted this questing to my attorney yet. I kind of wanted to see what the consensus on here was before I pop the question. Thanks in advance for all of your expertise.

Loading replies...