Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
1
Votes
Maya Gavasheli
1
Votes |
9
Posts

Self Directed IRA's creative use

Maya Gavasheli
Posted

For example, if I have 200k ish cash and 350k SDIRA. 

And I want to buy a house out off market, all cash ARV 700k and sellers are asking 500k..

And as I mentioned already I have only 200k ish cash, and this SDIRA, how real is it to lend the money from my SDIRA to somebody  who has  his own SDIRA and this somebody lends me back his SDIRA money... Isn't it win win situation? How legal is it?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,877
Posts
2,535
Votes
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,535
Votes |
2,877
Posts
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Maya Gavasheli

What you propose is a prohibited transaction. You are ultimately creating a transaction between yourself and your IRA. The other party would be viewed by the IRS as a "straw man".

Loading replies...