Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
1
Votes
Tyler Smith
1
Votes |
4
Posts

Self Directed IRA - Investing with "Disqualified Persons"

Tyler Smith
Posted

Hi All, 

I recently started a real estate investment company (50/50 ownership between me and my business partner) and am getting ready to launch the first fund.  

A few of my investors have inquired about investing via self-direct IRA, so we will likely make that an option. Upon hearing about this, my dad (who was going to invest anyways) thought this sounded like an interesting option. However, it looks like this would be in conflict with the "disqualified persons" rules (since I own 50% of the holding company).

I was wondering if there are any workarounds for this specific case. My dad has other financial resources to invest but using IRA funds would be the most logical and convenient. Since he will be treated like any other investor in the fund, and is simply looking at this as a good investment opportunity, it seems as if this rule is somewhat overly restrictive.

I will definitely engage my accountant on this but thought it would be worth checking if the BP community had any insights. 

Thanks!  
 

Loading replies...