Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Tax, SDIRAs & Cost Segregation
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 3 years ago on . Most recent reply presented by

User Stats

55
Posts
27
Votes
James Sebastian
27
Votes |
55
Posts

Bought property with encroachment

James Sebastian
Posted

So I just purchased property knowing the two neighbors behind me are encroaching.  This is a 1900 house and the lot lines are uneven, so when the subdivision behind me was platted 20 years ago, my lot protrudes 15 feet into two of those lots.  The surveyor's map showed this but the legal text didn't, so the developer basically sold these two lots as if they included part of my property.  Without going into excess detail,  I believe only one of them would have a valid adverse possession claim, based on the dates the houses and fences went in.

The crazy thing is that even Google maps clearly shows the conflict between the lot lines and their fences and sheds. I guess buying a REO you have to assume the previous owner was an idiot unless there is evidence to the contrary.

Although desirable, trying to "take back" the land would be petty and impractical, but I don't want this issue hanging over a future sale, or possibly being a liability issue for me.  I think granting them an easement would be quickest and easiest; quit-claiming the strip of land would be more expensive and complex.  I want to write the owners a letter (I'm 3 hours away) explaining the situation and asking them to at least pay the legal and recording fees for getting it cleaned up.  Anyone have a better idea, or a recommendation on what to write?  Thanks.

Loading replies...