Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

18
Posts
7
Votes
Joseph Belgrad
Pro Member
7
Votes |
18
Posts

203(k) vs. hard money lender for BRRRR

Joseph Belgrad
Pro Member
Posted

Hello, really new to BiggerPockets so if this topic has been discussed already then my mistake. Why use a hard money lender over a 203(k) loan when purchasing a fixer-upper? If the hard money lender lends at 12% interest and the 203(k) lends at 5% interest, it seems to make more sense to use the 203(k) initially and then refinance into a conventional loan in the same manner as you would if using a hard money lender. The only downside I can see to this is that you would have to live on site until the refinance due to the requirements of the 203(k) loan.

  • Joseph Belgrad
  • Loading replies...