Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Columbus, OH
1,771
Votes |
861
Posts

"Secured loan" aka borrowing against my own money? Any use in RE?

Account Closed
  • Investor
  • Columbus, OH
Posted

I recently deposited a large title company check at my friendly local credit union, proceeds from a recent sale. My model is BRRRR, so I will be hunting for another distressed asset to rehab, and that money will be the seed.

I had to sit down with a manager to do a couple minor tasks, and I mentioned that I also have a few other properties I own free and clear and intend on refi-ing or getting a line of credit on eventually, and he started suggesting this weird loan product that goes for 3% but is secured against the money I deposited. 

I admit I couldn't wrap my head around why this would be useful in any possible situation. I wouldn't be able to spend the money I am borrowing against since its the collateral, so to me it just seems like borrowing my own money and paying 3% for the privilege. 

However the manager kept saying it was a better idea than refinancing or LOC'ing the free and clear rentals I have now... I suspect he was trying to push a useless product on me, but maybe I am missing something??

Any idea if this is at all useful?  Am I missing something? 
   

Loading replies...