Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

107
Posts
14
Votes
John G.
  • New to Real Estate
  • the US of A
14
Votes |
107
Posts

Cash then ReFi vs Conventional Financing

John G.
  • New to Real Estate
  • the US of A
Posted

I understand the first half of this strategy... By buying a property in cash, it gives someone the upper-hand in negotiations vs someone using conventional financing. Then when the deal is done, refinance the property with a mortgage.

Now, don't both Cashout Re-Fis and HELOCs have higher rates than conventional loans?

If so, what are the advantages of this strategy when in the end you're stuck with a higher rate mortgage than if you just did it the conventional route? (Other than you get the property and the other guy didn't)

Loading replies...