Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

8
Posts
2
Votes
Greg Sonnier
  • Lafayette, LA
2
Votes |
8
Posts

Using SDIRA for Commercial Office

Greg Sonnier
  • Lafayette, LA
Posted
Would this be a prohibited transaction- Let's say I purchase a commercial office building with my SDIRA and lease that property to my full time employer. I am in outside sales and may use the office sometimes. Am I personally benefitting by using it and is this a prohibited transaction by using the office?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,877
Posts
2,535
Votes
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
2,535
Votes |
2,877
Posts
Brian Eastman
  • Self Directed IRA & 401k Advisor
  • Wenatchee, WA
Replied

@Greg Sonnier & @Eric M.

Actually, that may be allowed.  

There are two concerns:

  • Is the party you are leasing to a disqualified party
  • is there any direct or indirect benefit to you or a disqualified party to the plan

The company you work for would be disqualified to your plan if you or your lineal family have a controlling interest - either via greater than 49% equity or executive level decision making control over the business.  It does not sound on the surface as if that is the case.  

Whether there is any direct or indirect benefit to you is a bit more questionable.  If, for example, you pay a desk fee to the corporation and that is coming back to your plan, that might be an issue.  Similarly, if your willingness to lease property to the company bought you special consideration such as a promotion, raise, etc., the IRS may have issue with the transaction.  A situation where your willingness to provide capital to a business earns you a job with that company would also be considered an indirect benefit, but if you have been working for the employer for some time that is not going to be an issue.

The bottom lines is that if there is no real or perceived linkage between your retirement plan leasing to your employer and your work status with that employer, this could be OK.

We have many cases where someone who is a rank-and-file employee of a company will have an opportunity to buy a small stake in the company, lend to the company, or lease property to the company using retirement funds.  It can be OK.

Loading replies...