Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
Paul L.
  • Columbia, MD
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Keeping imputed interest from increasing price

Paul L.
  • Columbia, MD
Posted

I have a deal for $135,000 with 0% interest. This is in the form of a promissory note in exchange for the house. The seller is worried about tax liability down the line. Instead of a $135K loan at 0%, could we say something like "seller will take a promissory note for $135K, which includes (imputed interest rate)?" The actual sale price of the house isn't what is important to the parties, the total monies paid is what is important. Would this reduce the seller's tax liability? I realize this effectively reduces the sale price of the house significantly.

Loading replies...