Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 15 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

5,700
Posts
3,499
Votes
Rich Weese#2 Off Topic Contributor
  • Real Estate Investor
  • the villages, FL
3,499
Votes |
5,700
Posts

Who wants to start this business???

Rich Weese#2 Off Topic Contributor
  • Real Estate Investor
  • the villages, FL
Posted

Some recent BP forums on the same subject got me thinking. There seems to be a problem inherent with double close, wholesalers with no money of their own etc. A recent post suggested by Will B got me thinking. He suggested the person set up an LLC(single asset) to furnish the POF. Then have the 2nd buyer provide the real $$ though concurrent closing.
Why couldn't someone just start a business doing just that.
1.Form an LLC
2. Get a letter from the Bank President for POF.
3. Use the POF for wholesaler to get offer accepted.
4. Prepare the closings and get it done.
5. Person that formed the LLC receives a fee for having the POF and facilitating the deal.
The LLC never had money at risk and only needed the letter of POF. It seems someone could make a lot of money doing that on BP and helping out the wholesalers etc that are in the pinch. What you think?? Problems with it? Rich

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,995
Posts
17,199
Votes
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
17,199
Votes |
17,995
Posts
J Scott
  • Investor
  • Sarasota, FL
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by Rich Weese:
J Scott- Why do you think there seems to be so many problems with this interim period? Why don't you do it more , and for others? Could you do it WITHOUT using your funds and just a POF? Thanks. Rich


These are good questions, and questions I've been thinking about a lot lately...

Certainly, if I could find investors/wholesalers who were strictly doing simultaneous closings, and where I would never for a minute have any money at risk, I would do as many as I possibly could.

Around here (Atlanta), most investor-friendly title companies are only willing to double closes, where the wholesaler must close the first part of the transaction with his own funds before reselling to the end-buyer.

Because of this, there is some small risk that the second transaction will not close, and even in the best case scenario (where the loan is secured), I end up with a property that I don't necessarily want.

I would be happy to do these deals more often, given one of three scenarios:

1. The investor is doing a simultaneous close, where my money is never at risk;

2. I know the investor well and am confident that he'll close both sides of it so my risk is very small;

3. I don't really know the investor, but I'm willing to do a good bit of due diligence to ensure that if for some reason the investor can't close the second part of the transaction, I'll be happy with the property I get in return.

My current situation with my investor friend is #2 above. I'd love to do #1 above if there were investors around here who could do simultaneous closings. And as for #3, I might be willing to do these if the return were decent, but it's a good bit of due diligence for the small flat fee I'd be receiving.

The nice thing about #3 above is that after a few deals with the same investors, they start to move into the #2 category, at which point I can do less due diligence on each deal.

Loading replies...