Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 9 years ago,

User Stats

504
Posts
191
Votes
Arpan Patel
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
191
Votes |
504
Posts

Refinancing loans held by Retirement Plans

Arpan Patel
  • Investor
  • Chicago, IL
Posted

Hey all,

I'm a bit newer to bigger pockets as an active member and I had a question concerning retirement plans and leverage. If a retirement plan owns a rental property (say 5+ units) - leveraged with a non recourse loan - and in the process of renovations and other additions and expense subtractions, the NOI increased. Is it possible to refinance the non recourse loan to another with a higher principal amount in order to recoup costs associated with the build out?

I am not sure and I cannot seem to get a direct answer from any of my professional team members. One one hand, the property is worth more so why not? On the other hand, would that not be compensating the retirement plan for labor (of the owner and others) which would fly in the face of what a retirement plan was conceived for - passive gains? Any thoughts?

Thanks in advance

Loading replies...