Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 10 years ago,

User Stats

895
Posts
453
Votes
Micki M.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • York, UK
453
Votes |
895
Posts

Colorado - subject to vs wrap vs ??

Micki M.
  • Flipper/Rehabber
  • York, UK
Posted

A distressed owner came to me, he wants out of his property fast and he doesn't have the cash to get it retail ready or hold it much longer.

Value approx $85k

Estimated rent at least $800/mo

Mortgage $55k

Knowing what he would walk away with after a traditional retail sale, he may be willing to do a quick deal for the cash with a lower sales price.

My questions are

1. Is there a "best" way to structure the deal out of the options that don't involve a new loan? 

2. Does state or local law affect the answer to question 1?

3. Who would I close a deal like this through? Title? Lawyer? Both?

Loading replies...