Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 1 year ago,

User Stats

4
Posts
3
Votes
Brandon Lee
3
Votes |
4
Posts

Subject To Financing - What happens to the loan portion already paid off by seller?

Brandon Lee
Posted

Hello, I've been watching a lot of Pace Morby videos and researching online, but can't seem to find the answer to this simple question. In a sub-to deal, you are assuming the remaining payments of an existing mortgage. But do you also have to pay off the portion of the loan that's already been paid off by the seller?

Example: Seller's original mortgage was $500k. Seller paid off $200k of principal, leaving $300k remaining on the loan. Buyer assumes payments on the $300k balance, but what happens to the $200k that the seller paid off? How would he benefit from just transferring remaining payments to the buyer, while never getting his $200k back??

Sorry if I'm missing something dumb and obvious, but can't wrap my head around this part. Thank you for any help!

Loading replies...