Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,893
Posts
1,376
Votes
Rick Albert#2 House Hacking Contributor
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
1,376
Votes |
1,893
Posts

Seller Financing in High Cost Areas

Rick Albert#2 House Hacking Contributor
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hello All,

I keep thinking about Seller financing as it comes up a lot in discussions here in Los Angeles. Here are my initial thoughts:

1. When looking at high cost areas, it's so risky for a Seller to finance a large loan.

2. Even with interest rates in the 5%, it's still very risky for a Seller because in the event of foreclosure, they now have to cover the cost of the foreclosure plus property taxes, insurance, maintenance, etc. 

3. I would imagine most Seller financing requires 20%+ down. So for owner user who wants to put less down I would imagine it is a pass for a Seller.

4. From a tax perspective, assuming there are some levels of capital gains, it might make sense, but again, the perceived risk is so high.

What am I missing? When would it make sense for a Seller to consider financing in this market with low rates.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

473
Posts
452
Votes
Marco Bario
  • Specialist
  • Frederick, MD
452
Votes |
473
Posts
Marco Bario
  • Specialist
  • Frederick, MD
Replied

@Rick Albert -

In a state like California (I live in Los Angeles as well), a moderate earner who realizes a significant capital gain in a single year due to the sale of real estate could be faced with 40% or more in state and federal taxes on the profit. For that reason, installment sales are attractive.

The reason you don't see as many seller-financed transactions in our market now is that interest rates have been so low. 

Ideally, seller-financed interest rates are at least 4% above institutional, and the ideal terms are closer to 15 years. Given the size of loans here, the difference in payment vs. a 30-year institutional loan is significant. 

As interest rates rise, and credit tightens, I believe there will be an uptick in seller financing, even in markets like Los Angeles.

The best question to ask a seller who is on the fence about seller financing is to ask what they're going to do with the money. Goldman Sachs' Marcus money market accounts are currently paying 6/10 of a percent. A seller might be motivated to seek monthly income and a fair interest rate rather than hand 40% to the government and watch the rest shrivel and die in a money market account. 

Loading replies...