Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Creative Real Estate Financing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,880
Posts
1,374
Votes
Rick Albert#2 House Hacking Contributor
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
1,374
Votes |
1,880
Posts

Seller Financing in High Cost Areas

Rick Albert#2 House Hacking Contributor
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Hello All,

I keep thinking about Seller financing as it comes up a lot in discussions here in Los Angeles. Here are my initial thoughts:

1. When looking at high cost areas, it's so risky for a Seller to finance a large loan.

2. Even with interest rates in the 5%, it's still very risky for a Seller because in the event of foreclosure, they now have to cover the cost of the foreclosure plus property taxes, insurance, maintenance, etc. 

3. I would imagine most Seller financing requires 20%+ down. So for owner user who wants to put less down I would imagine it is a pass for a Seller.

4. From a tax perspective, assuming there are some levels of capital gains, it might make sense, but again, the perceived risk is so high.

What am I missing? When would it make sense for a Seller to consider financing in this market with low rates.

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

473
Posts
452
Votes
Marco Bario
  • Specialist
  • Frederick, MD
452
Votes |
473
Posts
Marco Bario
  • Specialist
  • Frederick, MD
Replied

@Rick Albert -

In a state like California (I live in Los Angeles as well), a moderate earner who realizes a significant capital gain in a single year due to the sale of real estate could be faced with 40% or more in state and federal taxes on the profit. For that reason, installment sales are attractive.

The reason you don't see as many seller-financed transactions in our market now is that interest rates have been so low. 

Ideally, seller-financed interest rates are at least 4% above institutional, and the ideal terms are closer to 15 years. Given the size of loans here, the difference in payment vs. a 30-year institutional loan is significant. 

As interest rates rise, and credit tightens, I believe there will be an uptick in seller financing, even in markets like Los Angeles.

The best question to ask a seller who is on the fence about seller financing is to ask what they're going to do with the money. Goldman Sachs' Marcus money market accounts are currently paying 6/10 of a percent. A seller might be motivated to seek monthly income and a fair interest rate rather than hand 40% to the government and watch the rest shrivel and die in a money market account. 

Loading replies...