Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 3 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
0
Votes
Jusstin Williams
  • Riverside, CA
0
Votes |
9
Posts

Single Family Vs. Small Multi (2-4 unit) Loans

Jusstin Williams
  • Riverside, CA
Posted

Hi! My name is Jusstin and I'm just starting my real estate journey. So far I have a real estate agent and have been working on getting pre-qualified for a loan so I can get a good idea of what price range to look in. I've contacted 3 lenders so far and have received one pre-qualification (waiting on the other 2). From the first and second lender I'm told that the down payment requirements for SFR and a small multi are different. For instance, I was pre-qualified for $500k with 7% down for a SFR, however if I go with 2 units it's 15% down, and 25% for 3-4 units. One of the other lenders told me something similar for small multi just hasn't given me the actual details yet. Is this typical or should I continue to shop loans?

Ideally I would like to come in somewhere between 3-10% for a conventional loan whether it's a single house or 4 units.

Additional details:

I'm currently located in SoCal in the inland empire and I'm also looking in this area too. This will be owner-occupied however I was told a conventional loan would be best because I have a business (sole proprietorship) that reports a net loss for last year and this will lower my income if I go with a FHA loan. Credit score is between 703-728 or so. Employed with the same place 5 plus years. Have 18k liquid and 45k in stocks, plus receiving another 18k in stock from my job next week.

If this is not typical should I just call lenders in my area and ask them what their loan terms are for the two different types of properties?

Any insight would be greatly appreciated :)

*also it's my first time actually posting so sorry if this has been covered before*

  • Jusstin Williams
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    546
    Posts
    270
    Votes
    Elise Marquette
    • Lender
    • Frisco, TX
    270
    Votes |
    546
    Posts
    Elise Marquette
    • Lender
    • Frisco, TX
    Replied

    @Jusstin Williams this is correct. All conventional owner occupied loans require 3-5% down fir a SFH, 15% for a duplex and 25% for 3-4 units. This will not change lender to lender on a conventional loan because all conventional loans have to meet certain requirements in order to be sold on a secondary market as such. FHA allows 3.5% down for 1-4 units.

    Loading replies...