Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

114
Posts
14
Votes
Paul Zofsak
  • Investor
  • Cypress, TX
14
Votes |
114
Posts

Initial loan with hard money and then refi with conventional???

Paul Zofsak
  • Investor
  • Cypress, TX
Posted

It was suggested to me that I could use hard money to secure a property and then refinance 3-4 months or so later to a conventional loan. The idea being that a refinance is easier to acquire than a standard conventional loan from the beginning; and possibly not require the standard 20%-25% down. Could someone please clarify this for me? I have looked into a conventional loan but have been told by one lender that my debt to income is too high since my first rental has not been on my taxes for two years. Would a hard money loan be easier to secure?

  • Paul Zofsak
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,573
    Posts
    928
    Votes
    David Beard
    • Investor
    • Cincinnati, OH
    928
    Votes |
    1,573
    Posts
    David Beard
    • Investor
    • Cincinnati, OH
    Replied

    The idea behind going with hard money is:

    Advantage at purchase - your offer is almost as good as cash, since the HML can close in a couple of weeks typically and underwriting is streamlined and much easier. An offer contingent on financing from a traditional bank is viewed much less favorably, if not just thrown in the trash can. Not only will that type of loan take 30-60 days to close, the condition of the property may be such that it can't even be financed by a bank, whether you're holding a pre-approval letter or not (that letter from the bank doesn't mean they'll take a distressed property as collateral, they won't!)

    You can finance the rehab - most banks won't finance the rehab on 1-4 unit properties. But by all means if you have one in your area that will, USE THEM!!

    You can do a no-cash-out refinance using a new appraisal in a much shorter period of time on a conventional loan (4-6 mths). Since the HML lent you funds for both purchase and rehab (many will go to 100% of P+R as long as the ARV is sufficient to keep the LTV below 65%), you are not looking for additional cash from the conventional take-out lender, just a refinance of the total HML loan.

    Loading replies...