Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

301
Posts
108
Votes
Kevin Yoo
  • San Diego, CA
108
Votes |
301
Posts

Using private money in California

Kevin Yoo
  • San Diego, CA
Posted

I currently fund my California fix and flips with a mixture of Hard Money and Private Money. I create a promissory note for the PM and record it as a second lien against the property.

With the current requirement in California that a broker must do real estate loans, can someone instruct me on how to do this properly? Are the following steps correct.

1. I find a deal and present it to PM.
2. I find a broker and give him the promissory note that I have created.
3. I sign it, the PM signs it, and the broker signs it. Is this correct.
4. I then pay the broker a fee. Is this correct and how much?

What happens if I don't do this with a broker?

Loading replies...