Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago,

User Stats

127
Posts
10
Votes
Matt Liu
  • Jersey City, NJ
10
Votes |
127
Posts

Overcoming the income obstacle for conventional

Matt Liu
  • Jersey City, NJ
Posted

I found one mortgage broker who is willing to qualify me for a triplex BASED ON THE CASHFLOW ALONE. She said: All you need is the money for the downpayment since the DebtCoverageRatio is so high. Of course... that was for an 80k property in Rochester.

Then, when I was looking at a 250k triplex in NJ, I found a mortgage guy from Investors Bank who was MUCH stricter - he only used 75% of the rent for the computation, AND said I have to have plenty other income so that my "housing payment quotient" is 30-40% of all my income.

Is the trick to deal with an understanding mortgage brokers who take a nice fee, rather than bankers who work with more red tape?

Loading replies...