Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

12
Posts
6
Votes
Jeremy Mims
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
6
Votes |
12
Posts

New Construction Loan vs. HML, which to use?

Jeremy Mims
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Los Angeles, CA
Posted

Let’s say that I am looking for a distressed property to rehab and rent out. What are the tradeoffs to using a new construction loan versus a hard money lender? Are there certain aspects of the property that would only qualify it for one versus the other?

From what I have researched, new construction loans have much lower interest rates (5-6% vs 12%+ for HML). So I am trying to figure out what would make hard money lenders more attractive in this case. Does the condition of the property determine which type of loan is available?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

128
Posts
113
Votes
Scott D Burrows
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
113
Votes |
128
Posts
Scott D Burrows
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Indianapolis, IN
Replied

@Jeremy Mims

The tradeoffs would be just that, looking at your case externally.

However, I assume that there are more legal parts to this question than I would be able to answer and I won't try to answer your question. 

On the face of it, 5% is better than 13%. However, hard money loans generally are done by private individuals and definitely very fluid or flexible to what you need to do on a flip.

Also, a homestyle loan (rates in the 4-6%) would also work for a distressed property, as it includes repairs and home cost into the total loan amount. Recommend you ask @Diana Muresan as I have worked with her and recommend. 

When you are saying new construction loans, do you mean conventional loans? 

If so, the tradeoffs would be a longer time to wait for closing, etc. Hard money would be a more seamless process, while still does require appraisal etc. However, a lot less middlemen involved with hard-money lending. If you are tempted to go the hard money route, give a call to a friend of mine at RCD Capital, Jonathan Surak. They have flip loans and landlord loans (8% interest only, which will come out to roughly the same payment as a conventional with principle pay-down (private so they don't count towards your property limit with conventional mortgages). 

Anyways, good luck and hope I didn't confuse you more. 

Summary: 

  • New construction or conventional 
    • Better interest rate
    • Slower time to process and close 
  • Hard money 
    • A little quicker
    • More expensive

Sincerely,

Scott

Loading replies...