Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
7
Votes
Justin Jolliffe
  • Investor
  • Leominster, MA
7
Votes |
17
Posts

The fastest way to eliminate PMI?

Justin Jolliffe
  • Investor
  • Leominster, MA
Posted

I'll cut straight to the point:

I am purchasing a 3 family to house hack and I want to get rid of PMI as soon as possible. Here are the numbers.

Purchase Price: $335,000

Gross Income $3600.

I have the money to put down 3.5%, even 5%, but which one is better to do? As of right now, I am thinking that placing 3.5% down on the house and putting my leftover money in the stock market, and consistently adding to it every month for a few years until I have a reasonable chunk of change. Then, I can dump it all into the house (Assuming the stock market does well) to reach a 20% equity stake, refinance and eliminate PMI.

I just can't stand the thought of my money sitting there in the house if it isn't working for me.  Until I get to the 20% mark, it seems foolish to put it towards the principal other than to marginally lower interest payments.  I am betting the stock market will do at least better than that option.

Am I approaching this the right way?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by @Justin Jolliffe:

I'll cut straight to the point:

I am purchasing a 3 family to house hack and I want to get rid of PMI as soon as possible. Here are the numbers.

Purchase Price: $335,000

Gross Income $3600.

I have the money to put down 3.5%, even 5%, but which one is better to do? As of right now, I am thinking that placing 3.5% down on the house and putting my leftover money in the stock market, and consistently adding to it every month for a few years until I have a reasonable chunk of change. Then, I can dump it all into the house (Assuming the stock market does well) to reach a 20% equity stake, refinance and eliminate PMI.

I just can't stand the thought of my money sitting there in the house if it isn't working for me.  Until I get to the 20% mark, it seems foolish to put it towards the principal other than to marginally lower interest payments.  I am betting the stock market will do at least better than that option.

Am I approaching this the right way?

Find someone local to you that offers Freddie Mac's 95% conventional LTV 2-4 unit program and will do a side-by-side.

FHA advantage: "Only" 3.5% down. DTI can sometimes be up north of 50%.

FHA disadvantage: Mortgage insurance is there for the life of the loan (you can refi to drop the MI, but what if rates at that point are back to historically normal levels of 7% or so?), and 1.75% UFMIP gets tacked onto your loan balance. 3.5% down + 1.75% UFMIP = 5.25%. FHA "self sufficiency" test can be a dealbreaker that does not come up until 2-3 weeks into the process.

FHLMC advantage: No funding fee tacked onto loan balance. PMI can be cancelled without needing to refinance, keeping the rate you locked when you purchased (this makes discount points more viable -- lock in a killer permanent rate while rates are low, keep it when you drop PMI!). Offer is seen as more attractive by listing agents. Your 5% down is 5% towards equity, there's no 1.75% getting tacked onto your loan balance. 

FHLMC disadvantage: "Larger" 5% down (but still less than 5.25% big picture). PMI is more expensive with bruised credit. Normal DTI requirement.

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...