Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

728
Posts
688
Votes
Jonathan Taylor Smith
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Durham / Raleigh (Triangle), NC
688
Votes |
728
Posts

Mortgages in Personal Name versus Business Entity

Jonathan Taylor Smith
  • Rental Property Investor
  • Durham / Raleigh (Triangle), NC
Posted

My first 3 properties were financed with 30-Year Mortgages (@ ~4.5% Fixed) in my personal name (Yes, I know... Bad, Bad, Horrible - Worst thing I could possibly do); and my $300K Liability per property + $3M Umbrella Insurance Policies are not certain to protect me.

I will someday deed these properties to my business entity or trust and see what happens with regard to the dreaded "Due on Sale" clause; however, my latest purchase will be within my entity from the start - but the terms are far less favorable @ 5.5% Fixed for 5-Years (Balloon) amortized over 15 years.

5-Year Balloon scares me to no end, as the property may not be paid off by then, and I cannot be certain of the ability to refinance at that time. This seems to me to be a far bigger risk to take than getting sued over one of the properties in my personal name and the insurance not covering me, so I'm paying more, for a bigger risk... No?

So should I stay awake at night worrying that someone may sue me and insurance not cover? Or should I stay awake at night worrying about this 5-Year Balloon? Currently I sleep like a baby, but as I progress with multiple balloon loans, that may change.

J.T.

  • Jonathan Taylor Smith
business profile image
Blue Chariot Realty & Management
5.0 stars
8 Reviews

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

45
Posts
13
Votes
Jack Halldin
  • Investor
  • Broomfield, CO
13
Votes |
45
Posts
Jack Halldin
  • Investor
  • Broomfield, CO
Replied

I don't know that I would be too worried about either, according to a recent survey in BP most smaller investors held property in their own name. With adequate liability insurance and assuming no willful negligence at your properties I think $3m should cover almost anything out there. Insurance companies don't sell that much coverage for as little as they do if there were many times it was utilized to the max. Over most recent history the balloon would not have been an issue getting refinanced, worse case if things are looking or trending poorly in financial markets you can refinance early.

Loading replies...