Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 8 years ago,

User Stats

8,794
Posts
4,382
Votes
Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
4,382
Votes |
8,794
Posts

Unsecured Line of Credit Requirements From Small Regionals

Bryan Hancock#4 Off Topic Contributor
  • Investor
  • Round Rock, TX
Posted

I visited with one of our banks today and they laid out the monkey math they used to underwrite LOC increases. Their 3 main criteria were:

1.  760+ FICO

2. DTI lower than high 30% range

3.  2X liquidity

For item 2 our banker claimed that they'd only count 25% - 50% of rental income for the "I" (denominator) in the DTI calculation.

Has anyone seen similar underwriting?  This seems quite punitive.  One of my banker buddies said other banks take all income and count 70% of the total, with 30% used for personal expenses; which seems equally dumb.  

Any thoughts banker guys or others?