Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/4c55d/4c55d80d9e9c56307c0657551942956d7cdebf54" alt=""
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/1bc6e/1bc6eaa078f2be59507d8082e9e6c9db9582a7ec" alt=""
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/43dee/43dee2bdc33dadf362a5d80e12b9887af577574f" alt=""
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated about 8 years ago on . Most recent reply
data:image/s3,"s3://crabby-images/deb26/deb26417f7e2a51b148ad6ae61ce8b2166378db7" alt="Chris Dutton's profile image"
Mortgage contingency - 50% Rule?
I'm in the process of purchasing a condo in a new construction triple-decker in Jamaica Plain. My unti (#3) was completed and listed first (in October), followed shortly by unit #2 (unit #1 is still under construction). Since this is a brand new construction, I will obviously be the first owner-occupant in the building.
My mortgage has a contingency known as the "50% rule", stating that at least one of the other two units must go under agreement before my mortgage is approved. I didn't think this would be a concern (units have been selling very quickly in the neighborhood), but for a number of reasons unit #2 still hasn't gone under agreement.
At this point my closing date has been pushed back 3 times, and I'm getting dangerously close to the end of my rental agreement (1/27).
Is this "50% rule" unavoidable in this circumstance, or are there lenders who would be willing to overlook it?