Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
1
Votes
Manson C.
  • Investor
  • San Mateo, CA
1
Votes |
19
Posts

How is "Income" Defined in Debt-to-Income (DTI) Ratio?

Manson C.
  • Investor
  • San Mateo, CA
Posted

A family member of mine is looking to get a Fannie Freddie loan for an investment property. He had a stable job in the same industry for the previous 20 years, but was unemployed for the past 18 months. About a month ago he got a new job in the same industry again.

I was told that in order to qualify for Fannie Freddie loan, DTI ratio needs to be under 45%. The question is: How is income counted for him?

Scenario #1

If you look at the income from his new job's paystub for the past month x 12, his DTI will be under 45%. Hence - Qualified.

Scenario #2

If you look at his last year's W2 or his year-to-date income, his income has been zero until he started his new job a month ago. DTI will be above 45%. Hence - Not qualified.

Scenario #3

If you look at his employment history before he was unemployed, he was having stable income for 20 years. DTI was under 45%. Hence - Qualified.

Which scenario is true when lender calculates DTI ratio?

Thanks.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

2,175
Posts
1,437
Votes
Albert Bui
  • Lender
  • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
1,437
Votes |
2,175
Posts
Albert Bui
  • Lender
  • Bellevue WA & Orange County, CA
Replied
Originally posted by @Manson C.:

A family member of mine is looking to get a Fannie Freddie loan for an investment property. He had a stable job in the same industry for the previous 20 years, but was unemployed for the past 18 months. About a month ago he got a new job in the same industry again.

I was told that in order to qualify for Fannie Freddie loan, DTI ratio needs to be under 45%. The question is: How is income counted for him?

Scenario #1

If you look at the income from his new job's paystub for the past month x 12, his DTI will be under 45%. Hence - Qualified.

Scenario #2

If you look at his last year's W2 or his year-to-date income, his income has been zero until he started his new job a month ago. DTI will be above 45%. Hence - Not qualified.

Scenario #3

If you look at his employment history before he was unemployed, he was having stable income for 20 years. DTI was under 45%. Hence - Qualified.

Which scenario is true when lender calculates DTI ratio?

Thanks.

 Here is a real lending answer, since he was off work for more than 12 months he will "generally," need min 6 months on the new job and we can only use his salary or base income only. The other variable income such as bonuses, commissions, overtime, etc will need min 12-24 months to use these sources.

So if his Income is projected to be 50,000 + 45,000 in commissions then we'd only use 50,000/ 12 = $4166.67 per month till month 12-24 in which we may consider his variable income sources. In most cases underwriters want to see full 2+ years to use variable sources however I've seen it used in 1 year or longer.

The above scenarios do not matter as long as he can document atleast 2 full years of employment sometime in his past he will be fine.

  • Albert Bui
  • Loading replies...