Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago,

User Stats

10
Posts
2
Votes
Conner Snodgrass
  • Charleston, WV
2
Votes |
10
Posts

FHA Loan on a single property with two duplexes?

Conner Snodgrass
  • Charleston, WV
Posted

I am interested in buying a duplex but a bit confused how the "bonus" duplex that is also on the same lot will work in regards to financing. Does anyone have any experience with this?

To further explain it looks like the first duplex is move-in ready and the "bonus" one needs a complete rehab and is uninhabitable. They are on the same tax parcel. I am not sure how FHA will view this second duplex. I did find the following statute but don't think it applies due to the "uninhabitable" condition.

So my question is, will this qualify for FHA financing? I would also be curious to know whether or not it might fit 203(k) guidelines.

Thanks for your help, happy to answer any additional questions.

Loading replies...