Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 8 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

81
Posts
9
Votes
Duane Hundley
  • Investor
  • Lynchburg , VA
9
Votes |
81
Posts

Conventional Loan Rules for 20% Down

Duane Hundley
  • Investor
  • Lynchburg , VA
Posted
I'm looking at doing a conventional loan on a property that I'll rent to my sister and mom. On the down payment of 20% where can this come from? I was thinking about using a 0% check with my credit card for the $10k.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

9,934
Posts
10,788
Votes
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
10,788
Votes |
9,934
Posts
Chris Mason
  • Lender
  • California
ModeratorReplied
Originally posted by @Account Closed:

It seems like someone on BP recently said that if you buy a property for your Mom, you can get owner-occupied FHA financing. You might want to check into those rules. Then, you'd only need 3.5% down.

It's actually Fannie Mae, not FHA. 3% or 5% down depending on census tract and income, owner occupied interest rate pricing applies (which is AWESOME). But cannot use rental income to qualify, if needed. And it's supposed to be a situation where mom couldn't qualify on her own, but the bar to "prove a negative" is pretty low.

Incidentally, assuming sufficient income to qualify, it's something that almost every BPer with parents that aren't in the best spot should look at. Mom/dad gets a place to live in their golden years, which is something you might have needed to pay for any-damn-ways except this way it isn't one of those abusive dictator nurse places, and X years from now your reward is that you have a new rental property that you only had to put 5% down on. Karma is rewarding you for doing the right thing and taking care of your folks.

There is no cap on how many of your and your spouse's combined four parents you can do this for, but if you try using it multiple times be prepared to prove to a skeptical underwriter that mom did indeed actually move in, and that you are not collecting rent from her (according to your accurate Schedule E).

Also, because this is a principal residence per Fannie's definition, and not a second home or investment property, that means it can in theory be an 11th financed property. 

  • Chris Mason
  • Loading replies...