Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 9 years ago, 11/24/2015

User Stats

1,887
Posts
1,261
Votes
Andrey Y.
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
1,261
Votes |
1,887
Posts

Lender could not deliver loan as promised

Andrey Y.
  • Specialist
  • Honolulu, HI
Posted

Hello all, I am hoping you guys (especially lenders) could chime in on this. Long story short, I have agreed to do a cash out-refinance of a free and clear property, 75% LTV at 4.5% interest.

About three weeks or so, into a planned 30 day close, the lender informs me that the property in question (a condo), may not have a required 51% owner occupancy, and I quote, "we may have issues".

So i politely informed him that the property most certainly has lower than 51% occupancy, hence it being a good investment. He quickly found some lender that would do only 60% LTV, 3.875%, 1.5 points.

I asked him what my options were. I asked if I would be responsible for the appraisal if I decide not to proceed with the new terms. He blatantly ignored that question completely. He also informed me that the new terms were not negotiable, ie. it has to be 1.5 points.

Is this ethical on his part? How can it be my responsibility as a customer to know underwriting guidelines of his firm and Fannie Mae/Freddie Mac. As an experienced lender, he only realized the owner occupancy issue towards the end of the closing? The client cannot be held responsible for this error, logically.

I agreed to proceed with the new terms even though his (lack of) professionalism, and the 60%LTV, is not sitting right with me.

Loading replies...