Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/hospitable-deef083b895516ce26951b0ca48cf8f170861d742d4a4cb6cf5d19396b5eaac6.png)
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_trust-2bcce80d03411a9e99a3cbcf4201c034562e18a3fc6eecd3fd22ecd5350c3aa5.avif)
![](http://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/assets/forums/sponsors/equity_1031_exchange-96bbcda3f8ad2d724c0ac759709c7e295979badd52e428240d6eaad5c8eff385.avif)
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 9 years ago on . Most recent reply
![Sergey Tkachev's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/32360/1700181380-avatar-serge0101.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/crop=356x356@35x0/cover=128x128&v=2)
Borrow against one deal to fund another - private or hard money?
I am looking at a 4-unit Sacramento, CA that a partner and I want to buy - it needs rehab and will only sell for cash. Our plan is to purchase for cash, rehab and refinance out into a 30 year mortgage and hold it as a rental.
I would normally use my own funds for the purchase but they are sitting in a recently rehabbed property that is listed for sale. So I'm looking for short term cash.
The rehabbed property I have listed for sale is worth more than the property we're looking to purchase. Time is of the essence as we potentially need to show proof of funds next week and close within a short period of time. The seller is a bank.
Here are my questions:
1) Would you use (a) the property being purchased as the collateral or (b) the property that is already rehabbed and waiting to be sold? Using the rehabbed property will likely speed up the borrowing process but is it worth tying it up to make the purchase of another property? Once the property sells the lender can be paid back right away.
2) Would you go with a private lender or hard money, assuming private lenders will likely be less expensive but may not be as quick as a hard money lender? Or maybe I am wrong on that assumption? I am still looking for both available options.
3) Is using a hard money lender even a viable option when purchasing from a bank?
4) What other options are out there?
I'm interested to hear what others would do. My gut feeling is telling me it would be better to use a private lender as opposed to hard money.
P.S. - I understand that a lot more goes into the equation but I'm trying to keep it short and to the point. Let me know if I should clarify anything to make more sense :)
Most Popular Reply
![Bill Thompson's profile image](https://bpimg.biggerpockets.com/no_overlay/uploads/social_user/user_avatar/373091/1621447402-avatar-billt7.jpg?twic=v1/output=image/cover=128x128&v=2)
Sergey, if you need to move fast, hard money is your best option. A hard money lender will require you to have skin in the game so expect come up with 30% of ARV out of your own pocket.
Yes, hard money is very expensive but totally worth it for buying distressed properties. I find that distressed properties tend to get snapped-up quickly by bottom feeders looking for a deal. Have you ever lost a deal to a so-called cash buyer? Many of the cash buyers out there are not sitting on a ton of cash... they use hard money. Do yourself a favor and establish a relationship with a reputable hard money lender. They can provide proof of funds letters so that you can make strong cash offers on prospective deals. You can use an all-cash offer as leverage to achieve a lower purchase price.
One key point to consider is you must be able to "get in and get out" fast. Hard money is not appropriate if you anticipating a long holding period before being able to sell or refinance-out.