Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 11 years ago,

User Stats

34
Posts
10
Votes
Garrett M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • NYC
10
Votes |
34
Posts

First Deal Strategy - Conventional / FHA - A bit confused

Garrett M.
  • Real Estate Investor
  • NYC
Posted

Just looking to clarify a few points so I can better understand the direction I want to move in REI.

As of today I have enough for a 20% down payment in my area. Triplex, owner occupied.

I am looking to move into my first deal for at least 2 years while renting out the other two units. After this time, I would move out and do this again with another property.

I see three scenarios here:

1 - Putting 20 down would allow me to get in to my first deal but would require a longer time to save for a down payment for a second deal assuming I go conventional. I believe (and please correct me if I am wrong) I could go conventional for my first and FHA for my second at 3.5% down payment with lifetime PMI or conventional at 5% down payment with temporary PMI.

2 - Putting 5% / 10% down with conventional, paying PMI until my equity is 20% and then getting rid of the PMI. Would I have to refinance for this or just re-appriase?

2 - Going FHA with 3.5% down and essentially repeating scenario 2 but having a permanent cash outflow for PMI. I see may folks on this site praising FHA but I do not understand the benefit. If I could put 5% down and avoid lifetime PMI plus all the other upfront FHA costs I would do it in a heartbeat over FHA. If I only had 3.5% I would save up until I could make the minimum for conventional. Unless there is something I am missing, why ever go FHA?

Looking for any insight that can be offered here on if I am asking the rights questions or missing out on a point entirely.

Loading replies...