Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

1,036
Posts
1,596
Votes
Stuart Udis
#3 Innovative Strategies Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
1,596
Votes |
1,036
Posts

Loan to Cost – Not All Lenders calculate equally

Stuart Udis
#3 Innovative Strategies Contributor
  • Attorney
  • Philadelphia
Posted

I recently had a client come to me looking for assistance securing a construction loan. The client prioritized leverage and was adamant a hard money lender would offer the best terms citing the higher LTC. I frequently see the same rationale used in these forums. I believe there could be other benefits and reasons to use a hard money lender such as transactional ease (depending on lender) or perhaps even as a way of opening doors for borrowers who may not qualify for bank financing. However, when it comes to selecting a lender solely based on leverage it’s important to understand what’s included in each lender’s definition of loan to cost. By way of example, a lender who excludes settlement costs and requires the borrower to fund the interest reserve is vastly different than a lender who includes the settlement costs and an interest reserve that’s capitalized in the loan. Take a look at the following side by side analysis of the sources and uses prepared by two lenders, one who advertised their loan product at 80% LTC and the other at 90% LTC. The lesson here is to understand what each particular lender includes in their Loan to Cost definition because it can have a significant impact on the cash requirements.

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    1,036
    Posts
    1,596
    Votes
    Stuart Udis
    #3 Innovative Strategies Contributor
    • Attorney
    • Philadelphia
    1,596
    Votes |
    1,036
    Posts
    Stuart Udis
    #3 Innovative Strategies Contributor
    • Attorney
    • Philadelphia
    Replied

     @John O'Leary I've seen the adjustable LTC based on experience but in my example neither lender adjusted their LTC based on experience. The 90% LTC lender only applied the purchase price and the soft/hard construction costs & contingency to their definition of LTC whereas the 80% LTC lender also financed 80% of the settlement costs and interest reserve. I have seen everything from settlement costs included/not included to interest reserves capitalized (as was the case in my 80% LTC example. I have also seen no interest reserve whatsoever and while the cash needed on day of origination might seem much lower, once applied to the transaction, the cash requirement is actually much higher (albeit partially delayed in being required). The point I was trying to get across is lenders incorporate different project cost line items into their LTC and the lender who advertises the higher LTC, may not actually be the lender who provides the best leverage depending on what portion of the transaction is financed.

  • Stuart Udis
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...