Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

15
Posts
13
Votes
Dewayne Perry
13
Votes |
15
Posts

What ratios to look at for loaning private money? LTV, LTC?

Dewayne Perry
Posted

I'm wanting to get into PML. I understand the after repair LTV should be no more than 65-70%. But I'm more confused on the LTV prior to rehab. Let's say a property cost $300K and needs $150K for rehab so total cost $450K. I saw another post where someone recommended to cap the LTC at 88%. So $396K, leaving the borrower to bring $54K into the deal. But the problem there is what happens if the borrower immediately runs off with the money? The $300K went to the seller and now the borrower has $96K in his pocket. If I foreclose on the home I'm still going to be out quite a bit of money. So I think I'm missing something here.

Is it the case that rehab costs are only given as reimbursements as opposed to upfront? So loan 88% of $300K, which would be $264K, borrower puts up $36K as a down payment, then self funds the $150K rehab and I reimburse after he pays for the rehab? Is that how it works? If so, at what point exactly would I be reimbursing the borrower? And if they have the money to pay for the rehab upfront, why do they need to borrow money from me for the rehab? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,576
Posts
4,417
Votes
Robin Simon
#3 Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice Contributor
  • Lender
  • Austin, TX
4,417
Votes |
4,576
Posts
Robin Simon
#3 Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice Contributor
  • Lender
  • Austin, TX
Replied
Quote from @Dewayne Perry:

I'm wanting to get into PML. I understand the after repair LTV should be no more than 65-70%. But I'm more confused on the LTV prior to rehab. Let's say a property cost $300K and needs $150K for rehab so total cost $450K. I saw another post where someone recommended to cap the LTC at 88%. So $396K, leaving the borrower to bring $54K into the deal. But the problem there is what happens if the borrower immediately runs off with the money? The $300K went to the seller and now the borrower has $96K in his pocket. If I foreclose on the home I'm still going to be out quite a bit of money. So I think I'm missing something here.

Is it the case that rehab costs are only given as reimbursements as opposed to upfront? So loan 88% of $300K, which would be $264K, borrower puts up $36K as a down payment, then self funds the $150K rehab and I reimburse after he pays for the rehab? Is that how it works? If so, at what point exactly would I be reimbursing the borrower? And if they have the money to pay for the rehab upfront, why do they need to borrow money from me for the rehab? 


 Yes, you are on the right track - you want to do a disbursement "draw" process - where the funds are typically released in installments, and based on verified completed steps of the renovation

  • Robin Simon
  • [email protected]
  • Loading replies...