Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 1 year ago, 09/07/2023

User Stats

6
Posts
0
Votes
Huy Vo
  • New to Real Estate
  • Winston-Salem
0
Votes |
6
Posts

3% vs 5% Conventional Loan Options

Huy Vo
  • New to Real Estate
  • Winston-Salem
Posted

Hi BiggerPockets, I'm trying to get a pre-approval to purchase my first home and getting quotes from several lenders for both 3% and 5% down options. The overall estimates are I'll be getting the same rate on either scenario but I'll pay about $55 (50%) more on PMI with 3% down but I'll be saving $5000+ in total money invested with this option.

Doing a quick calculation for 3% down:
- my monthly PITI is more because I owe more.

- I pay more PMI, at $55*12=$660 per year.

And if I was to put invest $5000 into something else, on average I could get probably ~10% growth which earns $500 a year which is much less than $660. This makes paying 5% much more attractive. Am I missing anything here? Is it in general better to just pay 5% instead of 3% for a conventional loan?
Would appreciate your advice. Attaching the quote here for better referencing.

Loading replies...