Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 11 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

13
Posts
1
Votes
Lisa Green
  • Goodlettsville, TN
1
Votes |
13
Posts

Financing more than 100%

Lisa Green
  • Goodlettsville, TN
Posted

If you had the opportunity to finance more than you spent on a property - at a fixed rate for 15 years - would you do it? Or would you dial it down to improve cash flow?

On the property that we just finished, we're all in at $65k and the lender will allow us $89k based on appraisal. If we pick up this extra $24k, we can pay down variable debt or invest in other properties.

However, this obviously is not good for cash flow. The rent would more than cover PITI, but the cash flow will be nowhere near what we're accustomed to getting. We're up to about 20 SFRs, so we can't get 30-year fixed-rate mortgages anymore.

Thoughts?

Loading replies...