Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
Private Lending & Conventional Mortgage Advice
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 2 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

6
Posts
3
Votes
Ian Sara
  • Des Moines, IA
3
Votes |
6
Posts

W-2 vs Non W-2 Conventional Loan Financing

Ian Sara
  • Des Moines, IA
Posted

Hey All,

Is someone able to highlight the main differences or challenges between financing an investment property with a conventional loan with W-2 income vs non W-2?  My wife owns her own business but is technically a W-2 employee based on how we have the business entity structured, however, we were looking into changing that after this tax year to a sole proprietor where she wouldn't be a W-2 employee any longer.  Will this make qualifying for conventional financing a lot more complicated, or if we can show that she consistently pays herself with distributions every two weeks like a W-2 employee would will that ease any troubles that come with being self employed?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

6
Posts
3
Votes
Ian Sara
  • Des Moines, IA
3
Votes |
6
Posts
Ian Sara
  • Des Moines, IA
Replied
Quote from @Eric Veronica:

If you own more than 25% of an S-corporation then you are considered self employed.  As a self employed person, whether or not you pay yourself a W-2 or not doesnt usually matter.  The overall calculation of the business income is what matters.  Assume a scenario  you own 100% of the business.  

Scenario 1 - business net income is 100k per year and you pay yourself no W-2

Scenario 2 - business net income is 50k and you pay yourself a 50k W-2 salary

Scenario 3 - business breaks even and there is no net income and you pay yourself 100k W-2 Salary

In each scenario your annual income is 100k.  It does not matter a how you slice it. (NOTE there are some additional additions and subtractions that go into calculating self employed income.  Also the calculation changes if you own less than 100% of the business)

Overall switching to a sole proprietor/schedule C business should not change anything.  At the end of the day the cash flow analysis calculation is almost exactly the same for an S-Corp vs to a schedule C/sole proprietor.  You do not need to show consistent distribution history because if your are self-employed because the tax returns will tell the story.  

Thanks Eric, this is very helpful and makes sense.  As you stated, tax returns will tell the story regardless.

Loading replies...