Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 18 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

19
Posts
0
Votes
Gary Smith
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Sacramento, CA
0
Votes |
19
Posts

1st home - Live in for 9 mo. ?

Gary Smith
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Sacramento, CA
Posted

I want to buy my 1st home – wholesale (fixer, foreclosure, etc). I’d live in it for 9 months to a year, and do light renovation.

But considering this time of inflated prices, I'm wondering if it’s not a good time to do this. Is it still better than renting?

I'm in Washington state. The R/E market is still good here, but who knows. I know I can’t rely on appreciation, but would buying wholesale and renovating almost ensure coming out ahead?

I have great credit but only 1 year history. I’d be going stated. I can put $35k down.

Loading replies...