Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 4 years ago,

User Stats

2
Posts
0
Votes
V B.
  • New to Real Estate
0
Votes |
2
Posts

Bay Area, CA: Convert a Property from +ve to -ve Cash Flow?

V B.
  • New to Real Estate
Posted

All,

I have a SFH rental in Bay Area, CA. I have around 1.2 mil equity in the property and around ~460K loan. The house is cash flow +ve. Around 12K/year. I have high W-2 income (50% tax), and am thinking about doing a cash-out refi for about +500K and use that cash to reinvest/work-harder and bring the cash-flow to 0 or slightly -ve. This avoids paying tax of ~6K on the income. I can use the use the cash to either invest in tax free muni- bond index funds or other less risky investments. The property is in a highly sought after neighborhood in Santa Clara county with good schools and the property has historically appreciated at much higher rate than inflation. Did anyone consider something like this in the past? With rates being so-low it makes sense to borrow at historically low interest rates and making that money work harder and lowering my taxes. No point paying taxes when I am already at a higher tax bracket. Instead, it makes sense to bring down the tax to zero by using the home-equity built up.


Please let me know, if this thinking is flawed. Will appreciate any insights.