Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

72
Posts
112
Votes
Rob Kishi
  • Investor
  • Oakland CA & Las Vegas NV
112
Votes |
72
Posts

Do you have to live in the house using an FHA loan?

Rob Kishi
  • Investor
  • Oakland CA & Las Vegas NV
Posted

Hello,

My brother and I live in Oakland CA and are considering investing in a multi-family unit here in the bay area using an FHA loan. That being said, we like the home we're living in now and ideally wouldn't look to move however I believe that using an FHA loan requires the borrower to live in the financed property for at least a year?

My question is, is it common for people to "say" and "show" they live at the FHA financed residence by having the bills in their name and so forth without actually living there? If my brother uses an FHA loan to acquire a four-plex as his "primary residence" and then rents out all of the units instead of physically living in one, would it introduce a significant amount of risk, and if so what kind?

Thanks,
Rob 

Loading replies...