Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago,

User Stats

48
Posts
12
Votes
Sascha Weinberg
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Frankfurt, Germany
12
Votes |
48
Posts

Most/least efficient property segments

Sascha Weinberg
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Frankfurt, Germany
Posted

Hi BP,

I am curious to hear your opinion on this. Take a given City, no matter whether its high prices like San Francisco or lower price points like Cleveland, what is the most/least efficient segment of the market in terms of pricing? I would assume that SFH is the least efficient since a lot of participants might not be too well educated (and might have financial problems every now and then) whereas really big properties with 100+ units as a segment usually only have really well educated and funded participants. I guess you wont find any/as many great deals the bigger an asset gets in size. Do you agree?

Looking forward to your feedback!

Sascha

Loading replies...