Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 4 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

48
Posts
12
Votes
Sascha Weinberg
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Frankfurt, Germany
12
Votes |
48
Posts

Most/least efficient property segments

Sascha Weinberg
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Frankfurt, Germany
Posted

Hi BP,

I am curious to hear your opinion on this. Take a given City, no matter whether its high prices like San Francisco or lower price points like Cleveland, what is the most/least efficient segment of the market in terms of pricing? I would assume that SFH is the least efficient since a lot of participants might not be too well educated (and might have financial problems every now and then) whereas really big properties with 100+ units as a segment usually only have really well educated and funded participants. I guess you wont find any/as many great deals the bigger an asset gets in size. Do you agree?

Looking forward to your feedback!

Sascha

Loading replies...