Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 12 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

25
Posts
7
Votes
Deville Nunes
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lake Forest, CA
7
Votes |
25
Posts

I have a property that is paid off. I am taking $60,000 cash out to buy more investment properties. Should I;

Deville Nunes
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Lake Forest, CA
Posted

A.) Buy a 2 bedroom fixer for $38,000 in San Bernardino CA. and fix it up for $15,000. Rent for this would be $750 a month. It will be worth $70,000 once it's done.
With this house, I can borrow against it (because it's paid off), and keep re-investing.

OR

B.) Use the $60,000 as a down payment for 2 or 3 more investments properties that would rent for $750?
With these houses, I won't be able to borrow against them and re-invest.

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

147
Posts
75
Votes
Joffrey Long
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
75
Votes |
147
Posts
Joffrey Long
  • Lender
  • Los Angeles, CA
Replied

Deville,

I can relate to your question - have been in the same position of choosing many times.

I think there is a correct answer to your question. The problems is, to find the correct answer, you have to know where real estate prices are going.

Under option A, you would have more security, less work, and could ease your way into more property. If the market flattened or declined, you might be safer.

Under option B, if the market keeps going up, you'll make a lot more. Also, if you don't buy all 3 properties, and the market goes up and keeps going up, you won't be able to go back and get the 3 deals you can get now.

I'm in SF Valley / Los Angeles, and we make hard money loans in both Riverside and San Bernardino, so I know how depressed your prices got. As you know, when there's a shortage of property, your area goes up.

Also, in your area, you're buying BELOW replacement cost, so the new tract of homes down the street can't compete with you.

Part of your decision probably depends on your other assets, income, debts, and your ability to maybe hang in there if you buy 3 and the market flattens for a few years.

Hope that helps,

Joffrey

Loading replies...