Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
4
Votes
Scott Kelley
  • Lacey, WA
4
Votes |
52
Posts

Exceptions to the rules when buying

Scott Kelley
  • Lacey, WA
Posted

Hi all, I’m currently looking to find a “home run” buy and hold deal that will cash flow.  In my area, I really haven’t found anything because the market is currently so high.  I’m finding similar issues in other markets I’ve been assessing.

My question is this:  If you were to buy a house that didn’t meet the 1% rule for cash flow, what factors would you look at to break that rule, or would you ever buy a long term rental that didn’t meet the 1% rule?

There are some newer homes in my area (1-3 years old) that may be available at lower than market purchase prices, but they would generate between $2000-$2500 per month on a property that cost $300000-325000. Would you consider a property like this as a potential cash flow investment or only something to consider for appreciation?

Thanks
Scott

  • Scott Kelley
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    10,250
    Posts
    16,108
    Votes
    Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
    • Rental Property Investor
    • East Wenatchee, WA
    16,108
    Votes |
    10,250
    Posts
    Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
    • Rental Property Investor
    • East Wenatchee, WA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Scott Kelley:

    My question is this:  If you were to buy a house that didn’t meet the 1% rule for cash flow, what factors would you look at to break that rule, or would you ever buy a long term rental that didn’t meet the 1% rule?

    There are some newer homes in my area (1-3 years old) that may be available at lower than market purchase prices, but they would generate between $2000-$2500 per month on a property that cost $300000-325000. Would you consider a property like this as a potential cash flow investment or only something to consider for appreciation?



    I would only buy based on cashflow when I was new 2002-2005 or 6. I could find any day of the week a 5 bed MLS house for $105k that would rent for $1250 If I allowed pets. $1250 at the time was well above avg.

    As the years went by, I started focusing on equity capture. The purchase needs to be made at below FMV. These were usually cash or seller-financed buys from tired LLs. I'm ok breaking even when purchasing at 85ish% of 30-day market value. I also factor in (fudge?) principal paydown. Equity is more important to me now than it used to be when I was new. 'Cash-flow' can be inflated with long loan terms that keep you in debt forever.

    Those new builds you mentioned look worth looking into further. With a 30yr loan at a low rate, they may pencil. How much below market value do you think you could buy at? Buying below FMV is what's important to me in this market.

    Loading replies...