Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

52
Posts
4
Votes
Scott Kelley
  • Lacey, WA
4
Votes |
52
Posts

Exceptions to the rules when buying

Scott Kelley
  • Lacey, WA
Posted

Hi all, I’m currently looking to find a “home run” buy and hold deal that will cash flow.  In my area, I really haven’t found anything because the market is currently so high.  I’m finding similar issues in other markets I’ve been assessing.

My question is this:  If you were to buy a house that didn’t meet the 1% rule for cash flow, what factors would you look at to break that rule, or would you ever buy a long term rental that didn’t meet the 1% rule?

There are some newer homes in my area (1-3 years old) that may be available at lower than market purchase prices, but they would generate between $2000-$2500 per month on a property that cost $300000-325000. Would you consider a property like this as a potential cash flow investment or only something to consider for appreciation?

Thanks
Scott

  • Scott Kelley
  • Most Popular Reply

    User Stats

    10,254
    Posts
    16,113
    Votes
    Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
    • Rental Property Investor
    • East Wenatchee, WA
    16,113
    Votes |
    10,254
    Posts
    Steve Vaughan#1 Personal Finance Contributor
    • Rental Property Investor
    • East Wenatchee, WA
    Replied
    Originally posted by @Scott Kelley:

    My question is this:  If you were to buy a house that didn’t meet the 1% rule for cash flow, what factors would you look at to break that rule, or would you ever buy a long term rental that didn’t meet the 1% rule?

    There are some newer homes in my area (1-3 years old) that may be available at lower than market purchase prices, but they would generate between $2000-$2500 per month on a property that cost $300000-325000. Would you consider a property like this as a potential cash flow investment or only something to consider for appreciation?



    I would only buy based on cashflow when I was new 2002-2005 or 6. I could find any day of the week a 5 bed MLS house for $105k that would rent for $1250 If I allowed pets. $1250 at the time was well above avg.

    As the years went by, I started focusing on equity capture. The purchase needs to be made at below FMV. These were usually cash or seller-financed buys from tired LLs. I'm ok breaking even when purchasing at 85ish% of 30-day market value. I also factor in (fudge?) principal paydown. Equity is more important to me now than it used to be when I was new. 'Cash-flow' can be inflated with long loan terms that keep you in debt forever.

    Those new builds you mentioned look worth looking into further. With a 30yr loan at a low rate, they may pencil. How much below market value do you think you could buy at? Buying below FMV is what's important to me in this market.

    Loading replies...