General Real Estate Investing
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback
Updated over 5 years ago,
Buying and Holding out of State Vs In State
I live just outside of Denver, and I’m looking to buy another rental. Here’s my question. Should I buy in Denver, and focus on larger rents after I pay it off, or should I buy out of state for all cash and get immediate supplemental income?
Here’s a scenario. I can buy a duplex for $500,000 and make about $3,700 a month from that. However I’ll really only make $300 a month until it’s paid off.
I can buy a house out of state for $100,000 cash (my downpayment for a property in Denver) and get $800 a month immediately in rents.
Which one is better?
My end goal is to have enough passive income to retire and not have to work, so I like the greater rents for when they are paid off.
However, I could be scooping up a lot more properties that cost less, and be getting immediate income which would all be put back into investing.
Either way, I’m not taking any money from my investments now. They are purely there to “retire” earlier.
Any advice would be great. Thanks guys.