Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago,

User Stats

230
Posts
200
Votes
Edward Liu
  • Palo Alto, CA
200
Votes |
230
Posts

What are options if I disagree with insurance for claim?

Edward Liu
  • Palo Alto, CA
Posted

Recently I had to file an insurance claim on one of my buildings:  

There was a break in and vandals cut away copper pipes throughout the utility area/basement.  A lot of money had to be spent to restore water service as it was difficult to trace what was cut and identify all the breaks.  Also, hot water boiler was damaged beyond repair.  Many other things had to be done such as clean up basement due to water flooding, place tenants in hotels given water service could not be restored in certain period, etc.

Early indication from insurance adjustor is that my insurance does not cover stolen property - cost of install water pipes and restore water service is NOT covered (water pipes are treated as stolen property).  While they think the damaged boiler is covered (still doing final determination).

I have fairly standard insurance.  I see water pipes as part of the building (similar to doors and windows).  If they are cut away, why it is treated similar to a stolen TV?  Has any one had similar claim with insurance and how are those claims treated?

I know insurance has financial incentive to deny as much claim as possible.  What are options to fight it if I disagree or have some insurance expert to review the coverage?

Loading replies...