Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 5 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

9
Posts
2
Votes

Is the 1% rule always applicable?

Andrew Martherus
Posted

I found a great looking property to house hack in Tempe, AZ. It's a turn key 4plex walking distance from a major University (ASU) and definitely a nice place for me and my wife and toddler to live in. The only problem is that it's priced much higher than the 1% rule would allow. According to all the advice I shouldn't even consider a place that is below the 1% threshold. Here are my questions:

Can I take on a higher purchase price if all of the uniters were remodeled and would therefore require little to no repairs or maintenance?

Can I justify a higher purchase price if I am loving in one unit and therefore do not need to pay my own mortgage?

Can I justify a higher purchase price when it's close to a major University so I would likely never have an issue finding tenants?

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

4,856
Posts
3,022
Votes
Mike D'Arrigo
  • Turn key provider
  • San Jose, CA
3,022
Votes |
4,856
Posts
Mike D'Arrigo
  • Turn key provider
  • San Jose, CA
Replied

@Andrew Martherus personally, I think it's a meaningless metric. It says nothing about the bottom line and gives a distored picture when comparing returns across different markets since operating expenses can vary greatly by market. For instance, property taxes are nearly 3% in TX whereas they are only 1% in Kansas City and less than 1% in Birmingham. The only way to do a meaningful evaluation is to a projection of the full income and expenses and look at what the bottom line cash flow and CoC return is.

  • Mike D'Arrigo
  • Loading replies...