Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated almost 6 years ago, 02/24/2019

User Stats

52
Posts
7
Votes
Ian Lockwood
Pro Member
  • Winchester, VA
7
Votes |
52
Posts

How much money toward real estate vs. stocks?

Ian Lockwood
Pro Member
  • Winchester, VA
Posted

Hi all! Lately I've been contemplating this question and finally figured I should toss it out to the BP community. I'm curious how everyone decides how much of their money allocated for "investing" is put toward real estate acquisitions vs. stocks/bonds. For simplicity sake let's say "stocks/bonds" represent low cost index funds (largely hands-off), with an asset allocation that makes sense for a given persons age, geared toward saving for retirement. 

I not as interested in which is better (which has been debated at length in other threads), because I think they both have their place. Let's agree that they both can have value. What I'm curious about is are people putting 100% of their "investing" funds toward real estate and forgoing any stock market investing, or splitting it 50/50, or some other percentage? Diversification is always touted as an ideal approach, right? And what is the rationale for more or less in either direction?

Using a simple real world example, the maximum 2019 Roth IRA contribution is $6,000 per year. If a couple could max this out two years in a row, they would have contributed $24,000 toward "investments." However this also means that every two years they would have enough for a down payment on an investment property. Would you say put it all toward the investment property, or go 50/50 which would mean a $24,000 down payment every four years instead? Or maybe 75% toward real estate and 25% towards stocks/bonds? How would age effect this, since getting into the stock market sooner is always better to take advantage of exponential growth and to ride-out the highs & lows?

I realize this is an over-simplification of a complex question but I'm curious how everyone approaches this. I'm sure not every BP member is 100% all-in on real estate, so those individuals must have a rule of thumb for how much of their "investment" funds go toward different types of investments - real estate, stocks, other...

I'm eager to learn how everyone approaches this. I know I have been wrestling with it for some time now. 

Coincidentally this informative @Matt Faircloth video (https://www.biggerpockets.com/renewsblog/real-estate-investing-over-stocks/) was posted today and touches on this topic, but does not get into specifics about allocating different amounts of money between real estate and stocks/bonds. Unless of course the game plan is "All In" on real estate investing, which would certainly make me rethink my approach moving forward the next few years. 

  • Ian Lockwood
  • Loading replies...