Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 6 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

16
Posts
4
Votes
Angelo Van
  • Specialist
4
Votes |
16
Posts

Applying and judging the 1% rule

Angelo Van
  • Specialist
Posted

So i've heard many people talk about the 1% rule. The rule states that the monthly rent should be around 1% of the purchase price.  Now I want to say I do understand this is a rule of thumb and I do understand it's not the way to success but merely an indication or a way to filter options. I also understand that this number might vary from market to market. And I also heard things are overpriced at the moment....

However, I thought let me try to apply that in a real life situation. The number seems high to me. I've noticed when I was reading BP's books that the prices in USA seem fairly low (at least to me) yet it yields nice rents. So I thought let's do it on my Dutch market.

Example; https://www.funda.nl/koop/breda/huis-40055057-wilr...

Single family dwelling; 125m2, upper 60's, 5 bedrooms, 200k (euro).

I looked up similar houses meaning; (same age, rooms, +/- 10m2 more or less, similar location)

Rents varried from 890-1045. And average at 973. 

973/200k = 0,49%. 

This is twice as low as the 1% rule suggests. Is this because of my  market or is this really a bad deal? 

Is this 1% USA specific? If the number would be a little off I'd just tell myself that might be because of a completely different market or over priced properties. But this factor 2 just seems too large to me. Any thoughts about this 1% rule? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

17,478
Posts
30,165
Votes
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
30,165
Votes |
17,478
Posts
Russell Brazil
  • Real Estate Agent
  • Washington, D.C.
ModeratorReplied

Yield is a measure of the markets perception of the risk in an asset, the asset class or market. This is true for all types of investing, whether real estate, dividends, bonds etc. The higher the yield the higher the market views the risk in the asset, the lower the yield the lower the risk.

There are cities where you might get 3% or 4% of a properties value in rent, because those are high risk markets. There are other places you might get half a percent, because those are lower risk markets.

Neither is a good or bad investment. They merely are different risk levels. 

Many mistake the yield as the return in the asset, when it is in fact only a tiny component of the return. On a total return basis, the lower yield markets typically out perform the higher yield markets. 

My statements are generalized and generalized towards American real estate.

business profile image
District Invest Group
5.0 stars
44 Reviews

Loading replies...