Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
×
Take Your Forum Experience
to the Next Level
Create a free account and join over 3 million investors sharing
their journeys and helping each other succeed.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
Already a member?  Login here
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 14 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

17
Posts
1
Votes
Jason A.
  • Sacramento, CA
1
Votes |
17
Posts

Review closed deal numbers

Jason A.
  • Sacramento, CA
Posted

This is my first post. I've read through a lot of this site but wanted some validation that I was calculating the numbers correctly. I bought this property as a buy and hold in 2008 in California where prices were obviously still falling. It was a foreclosure and previously sold in March '05 for $355,000.

I've a assumed a generous reserve to cover capital expenses, at least I think it's conservative. The ROI is low, only 5%, but I'm curious what others think, given that the house will at some point appreciate, I'm using renter money to payoff the loan, etc.
I manage the property as well.

My actual return for the first year of ownership was 16%, as I did not need any reserve or spend as much on maintenance.

This property has been a great learning tool for me, but wanted some proffesional input on the deal (or not so deal).

Purchase price $160,000

Out of Pocket
Down @ 20% $32,000
Closing $6,738
Rehab $9,775
Total Out of pocket $48,513

Monthly Expenses
Mortgage $809
Ins & Tax $217
Water/Trash $100
Total Monthly Exp $1,126

Cash Flow
Rent $1,850
Expenses ($1,126)
Monthly Cash Flow $724

ROI
Gross Rent @ $1850 $22,200
Vacancy ($1,843)
Monthly Exp x 12 ($13,512)
Maintenance ($750)
Reserves ($3,700)
Annual Cash Flow $2,395

ROI = Annual Cash/Out of Pocket 4.94%

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

15,749
Posts
10,947
Votes
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
10,947
Votes |
15,749
Posts
Will Barnard
  • Developer
  • Santa Clarita, CA
ModeratorReplied

Jason,

It appears you have more of a long term appreciation play and that is certainly a viable strategy.
That said, it is common practice to assume that over a long period of time, your expenses will be close to half your gross rents which puts you in the monthly negative. I do know that some areas of CA can offer investments that keep the costs lower than the 50% mark, and hopefully, your appreciation works out, but again, that is a hope, not a certainty.

Here is how most here would analyze your deal:
$160k pruchase + $16,500 acquisition and rehab costs = $176,500 total
Gross monthly rent = $1850
$1850 / $176,500 = 1% monthly rent to acquisition cost ratio which is too low for most.
Cash flow:
$1850 gross
less $925 costs (50% rule)
less $809 debt Service
Equals $116 monthly cash flow but you had to invest $48,500 to get that so your cash on cash annual return is really 2.87% for an active investment which is very poor return. You could get that in a 10 year CD and stay 100% passive.
=

Loading replies...