Skip to content
×
PRO
Pro Members Get Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
$0
TODAY
$69.00/month when billed monthly.
$32.50/month when billed annually.
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated about 7 years ago,

User Stats

25
Posts
3
Votes
Alyse Moore
  • Investor
  • Chicago Heights, IL
3
Votes |
25
Posts

Contractor Instead of Inspector

Alyse Moore
  • Investor
  • Chicago Heights, IL
Posted

Hey Everyone!

I was wondering what are your thoughts and experienes of using a Contractor instead of an inspector as your initial "home inspection"? In any case I would personally follow the rule of thumb and have an inspector come in and inspect, however, when does it make sense to save the money on an inspector and have your contractor come out and look at the property instead??

I currently have a contractor who is great. Seems like he does everything an inspector can do and in addition to that he conveniently provides quotes so it's like having 2 in 1. My current contractor has diagnosed and found legitimate issues with my property that my inspector wasn't capable of doing, which in the end has cost me money I could've negotiated up-front for my current property. Honestly I think my contractor would've been well worth the money I paid my inspector. I was just pondering, and had the thought of why pay an inspector hundreds of dollars when I can just have my contractor come out and look at the property?? Does it make more sense to have both an inspector and contractor depending on the condition of the property, size, etc? 

Please share your thoughts!! I'm in the process of searching for a condo and/or townhome now that's in moderate to turn-key condition (on the surface). It'll be my primary residence for 1 or 2 years. I'm starting to believe my contractor would be much better at giving me a more in depth look at my property. OR it could be that my previous inspector wasn't any good.