Skip to content
×
Pro Members Get
Full Access!
Get off the sidelines and take action in real estate investing with BiggerPockets Pro. Our comprehensive suite of tools and resources minimize mistakes, support informed decisions, and propel you to success.
Advanced networking features
Market and Deal Finder tools
Property analysis calculators
Landlord Command Center
ANNUAL Save 54%
$32.50 /mo
$390 billed annualy
MONTHLY
$69 /mo
billed monthly
7 day free trial. Cancel anytime
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

31
Posts
29
Votes
Alex Z.
  • Investor
  • Ridgefield, WA
29
Votes |
31
Posts

Turnkey Rental Properties As A Business Model

Alex Z.
  • Investor
  • Ridgefield, WA
Posted

I have been researching turnkey rental properties as a means to get into real estate. I know there are reputable companies out there (some of them are on here). I know that they serve a need in the market with offering passive real estate investors a way to buy and hold real estate. 

But what I am struggling to comprehend is from the turnkey companies perspective what their incentive is for offering up cash flowing properties. It seems most of the companies own real estate in the same markets they are selling it. 

I sound cynical saying all this but here is what I am struggling with...

  • These companies are finding below market value deals and putting rehab money into them to the point that when they sell I am paying close to retail?
  • Are they making money by referring me to brokers, lenders, PMs, etc? 
  • Why aren't they just keeping these awesome deals for themselves?

I guess I am struggling to understand why, if these properties are good investments, are they offering them up instead of holding them?

Would someone with more experience be willing to shed some light on my mental block here? 

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,286
Posts
3,789
Votes
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
3,789
Votes |
3,286
Posts
Andrew Johnson
  • Real Estate Investor
  • Encinitas, CA
Replied

@Alex Z. I think that @James Wise and @Ali Boone hit most of it on the head.  It's just a fundamentally different business model.  I'm going to go out on a limb and say that James has spent money on a team, marketing, keeps contractors (or employs them directly) busy, etc.  The single investor that is doing buy-and-hold would pay disproportionately high marketing costs, probably doesn't have enough acquisitions to keep great contractors busy, etc.   Consequently, they would be at an economic disadvantage and their margins would be smaller.   

Not to mention, if an individual investor was sitting on massive amounts of capital, they might choose to buy one 300-unit apartment complex instead of owning 300 SFRs that they each had to rehab, rent, and manage.  So outside of the fundamental business model differences the "why wouldn't they keep the awesome deals for themselves?" answer could easily be: If I could afford 300 SFRs I'd rather have a 300 unit apartment complex.

Of course, that doesn't mean you should or shouldn't use a turnkey company.  Figure out where you want to invest, look at both options, and see how they compare.

Loading replies...