Skip to content
×
Try PRO Free Today!
BiggerPockets Pro offers you a comprehensive suite of tools and resources
Market and Deal Finder Tools
Deal Analysis Calculators
Property Management Software
Exclusive discounts to Home Depot, RentRedi, and more
$0
7 days free
$828/yr or $69/mo when billed monthly.
$390/yr or $32.5/mo when billed annually.
7 days free. Cancel anytime.
Already a Pro Member? Sign in here

Join Over 3 Million Real Estate Investors

Create a free BiggerPockets account to comment, participate, and connect with over 3 million real estate investors.
Use your real name
By signing up, you indicate that you agree to the BiggerPockets Terms & Conditions.
The community here is like my own little personal real estate army that I can depend upon to help me through ANY problems I come across.
General Real Estate Investing
All Forum Categories
Followed Discussions
Followed Categories
Followed People
Followed Locations
Market News & Data
General Info
Real Estate Strategies
Landlording & Rental Properties
Real Estate Professionals
Financial, Tax, & Legal
Real Estate Classifieds
Reviews & Feedback

Updated over 7 years ago on . Most recent reply

User Stats

313
Posts
68
Votes
Tim Kaminski
  • St. Petersburg, FL
68
Votes |
313
Posts

100 Yr Old Homes- Worth the Hassle?

Tim Kaminski
  • St. Petersburg, FL
Posted

Hello,

Looking to owner occupy a 3-4 unit multifamily and a lot of the homes I am looking at are all 90-100 year old.  Plenty are wood frame and being that I'm in Tampa, Fl, I am hesitant (Hurricanes/termites).  Some say, "Oh if they are still standing, then that shows that they are durable".  I am more looking at it as that most of the others have been torn down or destroyed (hurricanes, structural damage, etc.) and these are the ones that happen to be left.  It just happens that these are the properties that I can mostly afford as the market down here is very hot.

This is my first property that I plan on using as a Buy and Hold and I don't want to buy something that will put me in a hole for years to come.  

What is your experience with older homes? 

Do you recommend for/against? 

What year/decade do you draw the line on investment purposes?

Thanks!

Most Popular Reply

User Stats

3,269
Posts
2,367
Votes
Ann Bellamy
  • Lender
  • Tyngsboro, MA
2,367
Votes |
3,269
Posts
Ann Bellamy
  • Lender
  • Tyngsboro, MA
Replied

haha!  love the discussion of older homes.  Here in the Northeast, anything built from 1980 and newer is considered practically brand new, 1950 to 1980 is considered "newer",  about 1900 - 1950 is just sort of what you expect, and anything in the 1800s is considered old.  We don't really consider it truly old until it is built in the 1600s and 1700s, and anything that old is cherished if it has been maintained at all.  In Salem MA as @Karl B. referenced, there are multiple 1600s and 1700s homes - it's the place of the Salem Witch Trials.    Lots of history here.  You can practically trip over it when you open up any walls.  

So yes, we expect all those issues of old wiring and plumbing.  Remember, your best value is found by taking a distressed property, buying it right, and forcing appreciating by renovation.  I'd look for those properties, not avoid them.  Just get them cheap enough to account for the renovations.

Loading replies...